The Breakthrough Solution to Eliminating Difficult Parasites

When you have eliminated all the parasites you can find (or even think of) and there is still a health symptom, one of two things has happened: either the symptom isn’t being caused by a parasite after all, or you haven’t found the parasite causing it.

In my retracing search for the parasites that cause symptoms I eventually took a hard look at the spinal column. My first thought was that it wasn’t possible for parasites to live in the spine but upon deeper consideration, why not?

This is a conclusion I arrived at by a process of elimination. For years I have been effectively eliminating most if not all parasites in the digestive tract, and yet digestive tract symptoms persisted; I have been clearing the pancreas of worms and yet diabetes remained; treating the heart for flukes and yet an accelerated heart rate endured the treatment. Why?

I would have been willing to consider that there was some root cause other than a parasite, except that the symptomatic areas continued to test for parasite medicine. For readers who don’t know me personally, I feel I should specify the following: it isn’t my agenda to find a parasite – I’m happy for you if you don’t have one, but it is my agenda to be logical and logically, an organ test point doesn’t muscle test for parasite medicine unless a parasite is nearby. It is a fact that in all symptomatic cases, the symptomatic organs muscle test for parasite medicines. So reasonably, there must be one somewhere. But where?

Over time I ruled out everything in the body except two possibilities: a tapeworm that was simply too big and strong to kill, which was excreting bacteria that was in turn polluting the whole system, or parasites in the spine, which is an area too dense for a simple electromagnetic treatment to penetrate.

Praziquantel: Either, Or

The single common denominator in everyone who was symptomatic is that they tested for praziquantel at a high dose. A standard dose to test for is 2 pills x 600mg per pill (2x600mg) for a tapeworm, or 11x600mg for a fluke. Flukes are thought to be dosed based on body weight so if you were a bit lighter your dose would be prescribed at 9x600mg, if a bit heavier, 13x600mg. There’s a formula…and it’s nonsense. In fact the dosage shouldn’t be calculated for the person, it’s for the parasite and each organism needs it’s own dosage: an intestinal fluke needs 11x600mg regardless of the weight of the host, a lung fluke needs 17x600mg, an esophagus fluke needs 18x600mg. And the inconvenient truth is that praziquantel keeps on testing in people up to 600x600mg (e.g. 6 full bottles of 100 pills each of praziquantel 600mg), which is past the lethal dose. So we can use praziquantel to find the parasites indicated by these dosages, but not to treat them with it. Here’s a link to an article where I go into the history of how I clarified the process of dosage/quantity testing for the medicines.

What you need to know is that praziquantel only treats 2 things: tapeworms and flukes. If you had a roundworm you’d test for mebendazole; praziquantel is flatworm medicine. The problem arises in logically interpreting the data: if you are testing for mebendazole you definitely have a roundworm, if albendazole, almost definitely a hookworm, but if you test for praziquantel you have either a fluke or a tapeworm.

And Either/Or is problematic in a clinical setting, particularly when all we’re using in this context is logic to deduce what you have. Sure stool testing would be ideal, but it’s not accurate. My interpretation problem at a clinical level was that everyone was testing for these high doses of praziquantel in the same two different places: both the intestines and the spine.

A tapeworm could make sense because they can grow up to 25 feet in a human and excrete more bacteria than all your other parasites combined. These bacteria would start in the intestines but could wash throughout the body and express itself in every organ test point, in the same way that food colouring evenly dilutes through a glass of water. And where bacteria go, symptoms follow. Most of the symptoms a parasites causes are the result of damage from their bacteria, in the same way that you can imagine it wouldn’t be the squirrels in your attic that are the problem, so much as their poop soaking through the ceiling.

However, if a fluke were in the spine it would make even more sense, because anything in the spine trumps anything anywhere else. A fluke in the spine could cause symptoms must nastier than a tapeworm, since while it would excrete much less bacteria, what it does excrete would go straight to the brain causing untold irritation. In addition, from physical impingement of the parasite against the nerve bundle inside the spine, an imbalance might express itself via the nerves themselves into the symptomatic organs. Sure, a fluke in your heart could make it race, and yes bacteria from a tapeworm could as well, but so could a fluke pressing on the nerve inside the spinal column that goes to the heart. In the same way, a fluke in the lower vertebrae could impinge the nerve that goes to bladder, causing anything from frequent urination to full incontinence, while a fluke a little higher up could cause years of constipation by shutting down peristalsis of the large intestine.

So as I have said, either/or is problematic. It is problematic because we need to know which muscle testing point to use as a reference to know where to treat, how long to treat for (e.g. don’t stop too soon), and whether the treatment worked. Since at the dosages I’m talking about (from 19 praziquantel right up to 600) you can’t take the medicine, it’s an electromagnetic treatment or nothing, and for most people in the world, at this stage it’s nothing. But we can have a conversation about electromagnetism because I’ve developed this.

Tapeworm or Fluke

Before deciding where to treat and how long to treat for it was necessary to clarify what species of parasite the praziquantel was indicating. To reiterate, the difficulty in deciding this was that two different mutually contradictory test points where both indicating for the same dose of praziquantel, so the parasite could only be in one of them. Which location was it, intestines or spine? Which parasite was it, tapeworm or fluke?

If it was a tapeworm it was obviously in the intestines, since you can’t get a tapeworm in your spine, except for this unlucky person, which was extraordinarily rare. If instead it was a fluke it could have been either intestines or spine, since flukes can be in both locations, but these flukes were probably in the spine because of the severity of the symptoms. Lots of people pass intestinal flukes after my treatments, they’re common and relatively easy to eliminate, so a fluke that is resistant to treatment probably isn’t in the intestines to being with.

Breakthrough…figuratively

To differentiate one from the other, it was necessary to make a technical breakthrough in my treatments, since the methodology I had been using up till then wasn’t strong enough to get through a theoretical tapeworm’s head or a person’s actual spine. So I came up with something stronger. It took about 6 months of obsessing over it, and when I obsess, well, let’s say if you’ve emailed me in the last 6 months and I didn’t reply this was probably why.

Here’s a graphic representation of what I finally came up with.

I admit the image above isn’t perhaps the best technical representation of the technology so here’s a quick example:

The breakthrough solution ended up involving an extremely precise, narrow slice of the infrared spectrum, which sounds simple until you realize that the infrared spectrum is 1 million times the size of the spectrum of visible light. To put this in perspective, since the earth is 40,075 km around (24,901 miles), the spectrum of visible light would be represented by 40 meters of that total, or the width of a larger-sized yard. Then the wavelength I’ve identified would be you standing in the yard on a 4 meter square spot. Then you’d need to know how long to stand there as only after a certain number of hours does it become apparent that you’ve been standing in the right spot.

It looks like, historically speaking, nobody has taken the time to stand on quite this spot before, or if they did, nobody stayed long enough to see what would happen. And then moving out of metaphor and into practicality, even if some practitioner or scientist had identified this wavelength in the past, and even in the unlikely event that they got the duration right, they didn’t have the right parasite killing frequency to make it work using electromagnetism because everybody uses Rife’s numbers and he never solved the problem of the body always needing a different, random frequency to surrender up its parasites.

So this further step moves past simply having the correct frequency, which I already discovered, to clarifying the correct wavelength as a driver. The wavelength I’ve come up with gets right through the body, right through the spine, through bones and certainly through the head of a tapeworm if there was one. Also it’s quite safe, being in the infrared spectrum, so there’s no UV, no microwaves, no ultrasound, no radio waves, nothing illegal, controlled, banned or controversial. Just simple infrared. Except that it wasn’t simple.

Anyway, armed with this new deep-penetrating wavelength, I was in a position to determine the either/or question.

Logical Deduction

  • If the new treatment worked on the intestines, the parasite was probably in the intestines and therefore was probably a tapeworm.
  • If instead the treatment did not work on the intestines, but did work on the spine, it was probably a fluke.
  • Whereas if it didn’t work on either, the parasite was in neither location (which was unlikely, since I’d ruled everything else out).

So in fact the treatment worked…on the spine.

Which means the parasite represented by praziquantel 600mg x 19-600 pills was not in fact a tapeworm in the intestines but was most probably a fluke in the spine.

And frankly that makes a lot of sense, since everyone that was testing for this ultra-high dose of praziquantel had a different symptom. One person had constipation, another had neck pain. One had brain fog, another a rapid heart rate. Quite a few had major neurological conditions like diabetes, Alzheimer’s, MS and Fibromyalgia. These things are different right? But they’re also all the same: auto-immune disorders. The rhetoric states that the immune system is attacking itself.

Well what if it’s not attacking itself? What if it’s attacking parasites INSIDE the central nervous system? An attack on them would look as close to the immune system attacking itself as you could possibly get.

But can parasites actually be in the spine? 

The Structure of the Spine

Although I had been muscle testing the spine for years, I didn’t have a treatment methodology strong enough to get through the thick boney layer, at least not right through, so with a few exceptions (strongyloides being one of them) whatever I found in spine was staying there. In retrospect I had a bizarre belief that except for the microscopic strongyloides, the bigger parasites (e.g. roundworm & flukes) don’t get into the spine. This was based on some nebulous idea of a blood-brain barrier, where since the spine is classically defined as part of the brain (e.g. the spine is inside what is known as the central nervous system) there must somehow be a blood-spine barrier too. Well, it turns out there isn’t.

There are two things you need to know about the spine: it is porous and it is hollow.

1. The vertebrae themselves are porous:

All bones are porous, and bones are fed by blood vessels. In my article on Rheumatoid Arthritis I outline the manner in which parasite eggs wash into bone marrow through the blood stream. A quick summary of the relevant content is this:

Not all parasite eggs hatch in the stomach acid (which fact itself contradicts the mistaken idea that stronger stomach acid protects you from parasites – it actually enables them to hatch). Some eggs, instead of hatching in the stomach acid hitch a ride on the blood stream and hatch elsewhere. This is how a liver fluke, for example, gets into the liver. It didn’t hatch in the stomach and crawl to the liver, it hatched in the liver. The same goes for a lung fluke. Most hookworms are actually adapted to live in the bloodstream, that’s the only place they hatch (even when hookworms are contributing to a stomach-based gluten allergy reaction, it is because they have hatched in the blood vessels of the stomach wall–this also nicely explains why they don’t show up on a stomach scope). In other words, different species of parasites flush around the circulatory system and hatch wherever they are adapted to hatch, or possible wherever they randomly end up–it doesn’t need to be a parasite conspiracy, it might just be bad luck as to where they end up hatching. But they do hatch, and 90% of them hatch outside of the digestive tract, which places them inside your body.

For the sake of this explanation, let’s say the fluke referenced above by Praziquantel 400x600mg has hatched inside the osseous (boney) structure of the vertebrae itself. And this is exactly what some of them do.

Once inside the bone, it lives off the nutrients in the bone marrow and over time, causes various forms of arthritis, most probably fibromyalgia since flukes excrete an arsenic-loving bacteria and fibromyalgia is often characterized by arsenic toxicity.

2. Each vertebrae has a big space in the center:

Every vertebrae has a hollow center. When stacked on top of each other these make a hollow tube running down the middle of the spine, called the vertebral foramen (foramen is Latin for marketplace, or wide open space). All your nerves run down the center of this space, and are submerged in a fluid for further protection. The fluid, known as the cerebrospinal fluid serves a number of purposes, one of which is similar to motor oil in an engine–it carries parasite poop from the fluid itself to be washed out through the ears/eyes/nose/mouth.

To understand the vertebral foramen then, we not only need to know that there are nerves in it but that there is a conductive, self-cleaning fluid coating the nerves. When this fluid hosts parasites, such as strongyloides, in the image below, which almost universally lives in the spinal column, their poop (bad bacteria) fills the cerebrospinal fluid. Since the fluid is self-cleaning, it moves the bacteria up and out through the lymphatic drainage pathways: eyes/ears/nose/sinuses/mouth. On a side note, this is why ivermectin [strongyloides medicine] seldom if ever fully works–it doesn’t penetrate into the spinal column where the organism is hiding.

In the same way that strongyloides can exist in the spine, flukes can too, and so for that matter can roundworms and hookworms.

Parasites of the Spine

There appear to be 4 main species of parasites that get into the spine.

1. Hookworm (indicated by Albendazole)
2. Strongyloides (indicated by Ivermectin)
3. Roundworm (indicated by Mebendazole)
4. Flukes (indicated by Praziquantel)

5. Tapeworm, but I don’t consider that a likelihood due to it’s extreme rarity.

To help you recognize the parasites you’ve been reading about, here are some graphic illustrations of each. I think it’s just wonderful how modern science is doing such a great job of finding all these organisms in the human body, and the images below reinforce how well we’re understanding their role in spinal and neurological issues, as well as medical conditions in general.

All that is needed to identify parasites in the spine is to test the medicines listed above against spinal reference points and draw some logical conclusions. After spending years ruling out all other variables, I can save you the suspense: if the spine is muscle testing for parasite medicine, there is a parasite in the spine.

The specific protocol involves 3 steps:

1. Start with an indicator muscle to establish a baseline
2. Therapy-localize (e.g. touch) the specific vertebrae of the spine and redo the baseline test. Compare strength responses. If the test is weaker when the spine has been touched (the clinical term for this is therapy-localized), you have found where the problem is.
3. Still touching the same spot on the spine (that has already tested weak), introduce the above parasite medicines into the body’s electric field and evaluate which of them cancels out the weak response (also expressed as ‘tests strong’ or ‘turns a negative back to a positive’ or ‘the stimulus you are muscle testing for needing’). In this way you will find what the problem is. Focus then moves to how to get it out.

Where > What > How is the basis for being logical about evaluating the effectiveness of the treatment you’re trying. If after a treatment you can no longer find the what in the where, the how worked. If you still find the what, the how didn’t work. I think the problem with a lot of parasite treatments is that in the absence of quantifying the what to begin with, there’s no frame of reference to know if the how is working, and therefore no feedback loop to improve things. This can lead to a treatment agenda (e.g. a herbal cleanse you’re attached to selling without knowing if it’s working) that will tend to be limited in its effectiveness.

By simple logic then, if the spine is testing for fluke medicine, it probably has a fluke. If it is testing for hookworm medicine, it probably has hookworm. These organisms may be in the pores of the bone or they may be floating in the cerebrospinal fluid. Does it actually matter which? Either way they’re pooping and that’s not good because this poop, in the form of bacteria–bad bacteria–is washing directly into your cerebrospinal fluid, which is floating directly up to your brain.

Specifics, if you’re curious

When a region of the spine muscle tests (therapy-localizes) for a specific parasite medicine, there is still some subjectivity as to where the thing is that we’re finding.

Possibility 1: The muscle test is indicating something in the vertebral foramen itself. Parasites in this area will tend to cause the worst symptoms as not only would their bacteria flush directly up to your brain, but also the organisms themselves would directly impinge on the nerves, causing a number of acute symptoms from extreme back pain (e.g. a pinched nerve) to overstimulation of the nerves that go to organs, causing the organ to experience it’s own local imbalance (anything from heart flutters to constipation to chronic acid reflux). Parasites in this region tend to cause the most severe symptoms of any parasite anywhere in the body because for all intents and purposes, they are inside what is classified as your brain.

Possibility 2: The muscle test is indicating something in the porous bone tissue. Parasites invade the bones of the spine as easily as the bones of the hands and feet. How can medical science have been missing this for hundreds of years? Simple: bone biopsies are rarely done, and a biopsy of a vertebra is almost unheard of due to concerns about pain, permanent spinal damage and lawsuits. When a biopsy is done, remember that a random slice is not indicative of the whole, and even if they got the slice with strongyloides in it, or the fluke, they’re not looking for that so probably wouldn’t recognize it if they saw it.

The mind needs to theorize that it’s there before recognizing the need to search for it with the eyes, otherwise it’s simply too unbelievable. But a muscle test finds it, so the mind needs to make sense of that data, and like other bones of the body, the spinal bones can host parasites.

It is difficult to differentiate between possibility 1 (the foramen) and possibility 2 (the spinal bone marrow) when you’re forced to use the same test location (the spinous process of each vertebrae). But on the other hand it doesn’t entirely matter which location it is as both are bad business and parasites need to go regardless of where they are.

Possibility 3: It may not be in the spine at all. Pushing into the area for a muscle test could indicate that you have found the organism near the spine but outside of it. For example the small intestine is found to the front of the spine, and intestinal parasites will often be identifiable in a muscle test at different points throughout the body–this probably has to do with how their bacteria circulate, and to bring up the original example, a tapeworm in the intestines could in this manner show up when muscle testing spinal reference points. I thought this myself for about 6 months. It seems that a creative way of distinguishing between these possibilities might be to consider the soft muscle tissue to either side of the spine (e.g. iliocostalis and longissimus muscles) to indicate intestinal or stomach parasites, and only assume spinal parasites if the firm boney point of the spinous process is what is testing, but this is an extremely specific example that won’t be relevant to the average reader as differentiation depends on clinical palpation skills and a knowledge of anatomy, not to mention muscle testing that most people don’t have.

While some of the above details may not be of interest to the average person, what comes next is universal to all: symptoms and side effects.

Symptoms and Side Effects

Here’s a list of the top symptoms you’re likely to experience if you have a parasite somewhere in the spinal column.

  1. Back pain. If there were a fluke, for example, physically impinging on the spinal nerves it would cause you a lifetime of discomfort. This wouldn’t necessarily show up on a scope because a fluke is made of a soft, fleshy piece of muscle tissue. 
  2. Restless leg syndrome or a feeling of lower body restlessness. Parasites specifically in the lower vertebrae probably account for the bulk of cases of restless leg and pelvic pain.
  3. Neck Pain and shoulder pain can sometimes be caused by parasites in the mid-back and upper spine, particularly when all other variables have been ruled out and the symptoms persist.
  4. Inflammatory conditions like Fibromyalgia. Essentially, fibromyalgia is defined as ‘I hurt everywhere’. A series of flukes situated up and down the spinal column would account for this and might also explain why everyone I’ve tested for fibromyalgia has elevated levels of arsenic–a heavy metal associated with flukes.
  5. Acid reflux, particularly chronic reflux. There is a nerve that provokes the reflux response which travels through the thoracic vertebrae and can easily be impinged by parasites in that area. I had personal experience with this symptom, and only noticed it to fully go away when I cleared out a fluke in my upper thoracic spine. This factor might explain why an esophagus scope wouldn’t find anything in a case of severe reflux – the scope might be looking in entirely the wrong location.
  6. Alzheimer’s. I have long suspected that a fluke in the hippocampus (the brain region responsible for memory) was at the root of Alzheimer’s disease but it is just as possible that flukes lining the spinal column could excrete bacteria up the cerebrospinal fluid column that could directly affect the memory structures. I wouldn’t be surprised if a perfect storm of flukes in both locations were a factor as this is a horrible condition that has baffled all attempts to successfully treat it, my own included. I do find it notable that Alzheimer’s is associated with aluminum toxicity and aluminum, like arsenic is an element that sticks to you when you have elevated levels of bacteria that only come from a fluke or a tapeworm.
  7. Multiple Sclerosis. The core question of alzheimer’s applies in MS as well: are we dealing with parasites in the motor cortex of the brain, or simply bacteria flushing into the brain that is washing up from the lower regions of the spinal column? In cases of MS there is always calcium toxicity, and this type of calcium is associated with the bacteria that come from roundworm, specifically pork roundworm, trichina. Now that I’m looking for it, and know to interpret it this way, I frequently find trichina in the spine (mebendazole 400mg).
  8. Hangovers. Fascinatingly enough, a hangover turns out to be bacteria from parasites in the spinal column. If even a small amount of alcohol gives you a hangover, this is clearly not overconsumption, so what is it? Either the alcohol has mild anti-parasitic properties and is irritating the parasites in your spine, or the heavy metals in the alcohol (calcium, tin, lead, arsenic, aluminum, etc.) are feeding the bacteria that your spinal parasites are excreting. These bacteria, newly pooped out from a parasite, have a short life of their own and will become more metabolically active if they find a good source of their favourite heavy metal in your body. An increase in bacterial metabolites (poop, etc.) in your cerebrospinal fluid would directly increase intra-cranial pressure, and you would experience this as a severe headache. When you were drinking the night before, instead of a headache you call it a hangover. If not drinking, it’s just a headache and you blame stress.
  9. Headaches/Migraines. When you haven’t been drinking and the pain arises spontaneously, we call it a headache or depending on the severity and duration, a migraine. This relates back to the same root issue: increased bacterial pressure within the cerebrospinal fluid column, and these bacteria are typically being excreted into the area by parasites, which are themselves already in this area.
  10. Food Allergies: perhaps the most common symptom of all, and the reason some food allergies don’t resolve themselves when intestinal parasites are eliminated, reactivity to foods can easily originate from parasites in the spinal column. When the protein from the food reaches them, they probably use a particular enzyme to break it down which is inflammatory to us, and we interpret this as an allergy because it makes us feel rough. There are variations on this theme but the core principle is that the parasites causing the allergy can be anywhere, including the spine.

Some other probable conditions spinal parasites can cause, without explanation: dizziness, vertigo, motion sickness, hair thinning, hair loss, scalp rashes and dandruff, face rashes, sinus issues, seasonal allergies, epilepsy, diabetes, TMJ issues, pelvic issues, emotional imbalances including anxiety, anger, rage, depression and nightmares, brain fog, memory issues, speech issues and chronic itchiness. This is so diverse and fundamental because of it’s location directly inside the central nervous system. Parasites in the spine are a recipe for symptoms everywhere.

Elimination

Wouldn’t it be nice if all these things could just go away? According to my proposal, for the symptoms to go away the parasites from the spine would need to be eliminated.

But do you have just one or do you have many? The are 3 variables to parasite count:

  1. How many species (e.g. fluke, hookworm, roundworm)
  2. How many members within a species (e.g. 1 fluke or 20, 1 hookworm or 100, 1 strongyloides or 1000, etc)
  3. What size are they? (e.g. micrometers, millimeters or centimeters)

The more species you have, the more members within a species and the bigger those members are, the worse your symptoms will be. It’s cumulative and a perfect storm. Unfortunately it is rarely the case that the spine only has 1 thing in it. In symptomatic cases there tends to be a whole ecosystem: the more severe the symptoms, the larger the ecosystem of parasites.

The world isn’t even at the point where we are equating these conditions with parasites, but if we got around to doing so as a society, we would run up against the main technical problem of treating parasites in the spine, which is that anti-parasite medications don’t even soak into the spine. This probably explains why people who have taken these medicines over the years haven’t noticed much if any resolution to the symptoms above, which are generally all agreed to be insoluble problems.

Since medications don’t work on spinal parasites, the only medical option is surgery. In the case referenced above where the person had a tapeworm in the spine, which the whole world is talking about, surgeons needed to cut open the spine because the alternative was leaving it there to grow bigger. Except for strongyloides, parasites don’t multiply inside you, contrary to popular belief, but they do grow in size, which strangely isn’t commonly known.

So in the absence of surgery, if you have parasites in the spine causing symptoms, those symptoms will worsen over time: the organisms tend to grow in size, particularly flukes which can become quite big, and acquiring additional species from food sources makes matters worse. We call this the aging process or autoimmune, or just blame it on stress.

Really the only simple, clean, noninvasive way to get these things out, assuming they’re in there (which if you’re lucky they won’t be) is to use electromagnetism. The challenge up until now has been two-fold: finding a blanket frequency that eliminates all parasites, and finding a universal wavelength that reaches to all depths. Having now isolated both, and taken a couple months of trials to see what the variations are, I can outline them.

Variations

  1. Treatment time: varies considerably from 3 hrs to more than 6. The record has been 9 hrs for a single treatment, but that was something severe and a one-off (I hope). The average is 3 to 4 hrs.
  2. Number of treatments: this can also vary, depending on symptoms, from a single treatment resolving things to 6 or more treatments. It really depends on too many variables to be able to predict anything more than a range: 1-6 treatments, possibly more.
  3. Species: I am finding all 4 main species of parasites in the spine: fluke, roundworm, hookworm and filarial roundworm. Given sufficient treatment duration (which I can’t always predict) everything I am finding in a pre-treatment test tends to die during the treatment.
  4. Layers: But then on a next-day retest I will often find more organisms layered underneath. Referencing the images above, are we finding multiple species of parasite coexisting in the vertebral foramen, or is the test going deeper to identify what’s in the porous vertebrae itself? Or are the organisms in fact in the intestines, not in the spine? Careful examination and cross referencing of organ test points can help to differentiate these things and direct the treatment towards the appropriate area.

Practically, it is necessary to keep finding and eliminating parasites until the symptom goes away.

Clinically, it is difficult to predict how many layers will need to be treated, how much time needed as there is no way to know which parasites on which layer are causing which symptom. If you had a home-based treatment device, this would simply be a matter of trial and error–of doing more treatments and longer treatments until the symptoms resolved themselves. Since a home-based treatment system isn’t available at this stage, here’s my clinical feedback:

A treatment for spinal parasites typically starts with 1 appointment of 3 hours but could require multiple visits. I’d like to say “up to 6 visits” but it could be less or more–this is the point: the number of species of parasites layered into the spine is difficult to predict except to suggest that more severe symptoms correspond with a more severe infestation.

There is a technical reason why layers of parasites don’t all die at once but there is not the space here to go into it. I suspect it has do with dominant and recessive strains of parasite bacteria and how their fluctuating chemical-electric fields interact with our own bioelectric field. But simply put, they don’t all die at once, that’s not a realistic expectation at this point, multiple treatments are needed.

If this was your house and we were talking about termites, you could simply decide to move to a new house, but we can’t get new spines. The difficulty of this issue is underscored when we consider how socially entrenched medical issues are. Everybody knows there’s no cure to anything, it’s politically incorrect these days to even use the word cure. Could the complexity of this spinal parasite issue be one of the reasons why cures are so difficult to achieve?

In making the statements above, and in articulating the problem this way, I do commit to the assertion that there is an end in sight–a bottom. The body cannot have a bottomless pit of parasites or an infinite number of layers. But I don’t want to give the impression that I am able to predict where the bottom is in each case. It’s only possible to know you’ve reached the metaphorical bottom when the symptom resolves itself. Some highly complex, symptomatic cases resolve themselves quite quickly with a spinal parasite treatment, while other seemingly simple cases fail to quickly improve despite quantifying the elimination of several layers. But then on a reassuring note, some simple cases really are simple, and unfortunately, some complex cases really are complex.

I think that any of these options is an improvement over having your spine cut open but back to reality, how many people even understand that they have a parasite in their spine? Or an ecosystem of parasites. The thinking of the modern world hasn’t really prepared us to conceptualize this sort of thing, and with a muscle testing analysis being so heavily weighted on logic, and so light on visual evidence, it’s understandable to feel unhappy with all the uncertainty.

But do the symptoms go away in a reasonable amount of treatment time? Well, yes, often enough for it to be worth trying. I suspect that given enough treatment time, most medical conditions can resolve themselves (e.g. the body can heal itself) once the causative parasites are eliminated, and until now, eliminating parasites from the spinal column is something that has not been possible without surgery. It is a stone that our society has been forced to leave unturned. Given my success with Rheumatoid Arthritis, which ends up being hookworms in the bone marrow of the arthritic bones, I don’t see why most other neurological conditions should be any more difficult to resolve, again given enough time.

The treatments I’m outlining here aren’t mass-producible yet (e.g. I don’t yet have a treatment mat I can offer you by mail order), but they are available at a clinical level. If you’re nearby and have some time to spare, it’s worth looking into. Just please understand the treatment variations above and plan accordingly: leave an amount of time that is realistic for your symptom. I would reason that you might be setting yourself up for failure if your expectation is that one 2-3 hour treatment resolves a lifelong medical condition, but at the same time you could be selling yourself short if you decide to live with the condition without adequately addressing the parasite question, particularly the spinal parasite question.

Where to go from here

From the scientific altitude I have climbed to, I can see the next peak it makes sense to move towards. It would be great if the treatments could be sped up: 1 hr instead of 3 hrs, 1 treatment instead of 6. Or simply a way of making a home unit so the time doesn’t matter. If you’re not in a rush, you’re welcome to wait. I intend to get there.

There’s a big canyon in between where I’m standing and where I’d like to reach. Where, I think, we as a society all need to arrive at. It would be nice if I could ask someone the way, but I don’t get the impression anyone has traveled on quite this path before. So it might take some time to improve things further.

Stay tuned, and if you’re practically interested in the treatment in its current format, and want to see if you might benefit, feel free to book in or inquire.